Guidance from the UK Supreme Court on the Principle of Reflective Loss

11 OCT 2020


In the recent case of Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd the UK Supreme Court sought to clarify the nature and extent of the reflective loss principle. This article outlines what the principle is and how it has developed. Subsequently, we analyse the decision and explore its implications.

What is reflective loss?

The English law principle of reflective loss dictates that when a company suffers loss caused by the actions of a third party, any loss that is suffered by shareholders as a result of the diminution in value of their shares and/or distributions is not distinct from the loss suffered by the company. This prevents shareholders from bringing claims against the third party.

The basis of the principle is the decision in Foss v Harbottle. Here the court held that where a wrong is inflicted on a company the proper claimant is the company itself (save for a few exceptions such as derivative actions).

Development of the principle of reflective loss

The rule was first formulated in the case of Prudential Assurance v Newman Industries and then considered later, most notably, by the House of Lords in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co. Whilst these cases confirmed the existence of the principle, ambiguity arose as to its extent following the judgement in Gardner v Parker. In this case Neuberger LJ suggested that the principle applied not merely to shareholders but other corporate stakeholders such as creditors. This was considered by the Supreme court in Sevilleja v Marex.

Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd


Merex Financial Ltd (‘Merex’) obtained a judgement against two companies which were owned and controlled by Mr Sevillja. Merex argued that Mr Sevillja transferred $9.5 million from the companies to his own personal control while the judgement was still in draft form. This meant the judgement could not be satisfied as the companies consequently went into liquidation. As a result Merex pursued Mr Sevillja for the outstanding sums in tort.


At first instance it was held that Merex’s claim was not barred by the reflective loss principle. However, the Court of Appeal disagreed. The Supreme Court unanimously decided that the reflective loss principle does not apply to creditors of a company and therefore upheld Merex’s appeal. Whilst the court was unanimous on this point the Justices disagreed as to the scope of reflective loss when claims are brought by shareholders against third parties.

Reasoning of the Justices

The majority construed the principle of reflective loss narrowly. Under this interpretation shareholders are prevented from recovering losses suffered as a result of the diminution in value of their shares or distributions because such loss is not distinct from the loss which is suffered by the company. The minority went further to question the very foundations of the principle of reflective loss.


Non shareholding creditors
Whilst the Supreme Court Justices had divergent views on the conceptual formulation of the principle of reflective loss, they all agreed it did not extend to creditors of the company. This is a clear benefit for creditors such as corporate lenders who will not be prevented from bringing claims where a third party causes some form of damage to the debtor company.


It was confirmed by the majority that shareholders bringing claims against third parties who caused damage which resulted in diminution in the value of their shareholding, and or distributions, are barred under the reflective loss principle. However, shareholders claiming some other form of loss are not. This is be particularly beneficial to those shareholders who also have a creditor relationship with the company.

Shareholders who do not have a creditor relationship with the company, may in exceptional circumstances, be able to invoke the reasoning of the minority to argue that the reflective loss principle does not apply. This is likely to be particularly relevant in procedural or case management disputes where the parties may merely have to establish they have an ‘arguable case.’


Third parties who may cause damage to a company are at greater risk of being pursued for resulting losses as creditors will not be barred under the reflective loss principle if they have a claim against that third party. Those at greater risk include directors, professional service providers and commercial agents.

With greater potential exposure to litigation the insurance activities of third parties will be affected. For example directors may have to pay greater premiums for their directors and officers (‘D&O’) policy cover.


To conclude, the judgement in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd has narrowed the scope of reflective loss. The court affirmed that the principle is applicable in respect of shareholder claims for a fall in the value of shares and/or distributions where a third party defendant has caused damage to a company. However, shareholders acting other capacities for example as a creditor will not be prevented from bringing such claims because they are considered to be outside the scope of the principle. This will be welcomed by many shareholders, especially in the current economic climate of uncertainty and financial pressure, as they will now be able to pursue wrongdoers whose actions have diminished a company’s financial position.


For advice please contact us on

Yulia Barnes

Managing Partner

Yulia Barnes is our Managing Partner. She is an experienced solicitor and advises on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious matters for both private and corporate clients.

Experience Yulia started her legal career at a large international Magic Circle firm. She then became a partner at a regional law firm and headed a Dispute Resolution Department. She then moved in-house before starting her own Boutique practice, Barnes Law, with the aim of providing exclusive services to high net-worth individuals and privately-owned businesses. More details can be found on her LinkedIn profile.

Expertise Yulia and her team are widely recognised for their professional and practical approach to matters. She is committed to ensuring that her clients’ objectives are achieved in the most cost-effective way possible.

Approach Yulia has a wealth of experience working with businesses of all sizes: from large multinational corporations to start-ups. She has particular expertise in a hospitality industry, investment funds, private and corporate clients, and focuses on startups and technology-driven companies. Yulia brings the same level of attention to detail, professionalism and a personal touch to every case and client, and truly immerses herself in her clients’ businesses. She prides herself on her problem-solving, commercially astute approach and her track record of partnering with clients to help them achieve their strategic objectives.

Will Moran


Will joined Barnes Law as an Associate Solicitor in Spring 2023, shortly after qualifying in September 2022.

Will works mostly on real estate and corporate/commercial matters. Will enjoys providing advice on transactional matters.

Away from the office, Will can be found reading or playing golf. While he played rugby until university, and rowed throughout his degree, he now tends to watch both from the sidelines. During the winter he can also be found skiing.

Will plans to continue developing his legal skills and experience at Barnes Law, under the expertise and guidance provided by Yulia.

Mark Corran


Mark is an experienced solicitor whose practice areas include intellectual property (IP), IT, data protection and general commercial law.

Mark advises businesses of all sizes – from sole traders to corporations. Among his clients are: clothing and lifestyle brands, restaurants and food suppliers, IT companies, banks, hedge funds and venture capital firms, education providers, medical and pharmaceutical brands.

Outside of his practice, Mark also advises members of the Institute of Directors as part of its Directors’ Advisory Service.

Recent transactions
  • Prosecuting a UK trademark application on behalf of an education provider and representing them in related UK IPO opposition and revocation proceedings;
  • Advising a publisher and a delivery business on data protection matters, B2B and B2C Ts & Cs of sale, website and app Ts & Cs, all aspects of global brand protection;
  • Advising footwear brands, alternative asset managers and hedge funds on their global brand protection, including overcoming various refusals, representing them in opposition proceedings and settlement negotiations;
  • Representing a central bank in opposition proceedings before the UK IPO;
  • Advising a lifestyle brand concerning trademark clearance and protection, negotiations for a website/app development and maintenance agreement.

Ioulia Tatawat

Family Law Adviser

Ioulia has a solid background in family law and offers guidance, clarity, and support to clients during one of their most challenging times in their life.

She advises on all three pillars of separation: divorce, children matters and financial settlements. Ioulia is a member of Resolution and is keen to try to settle matters at early stages.

Ioulia is dedicated to assisting clients and navigating them through their legal matters with clarity and support.

Alex Reidy


Alex joined Barnes Law in September 2023 after finishing his master’s degree in law. Prior to joining Barnes Law, Alex worked in property litigation at Ashfords. Alex assists Yulia on a variety of both contentious and non-contentious matters.

Outside of the office, Alex enjoys reading and hiking. Prior to working in law, Alex was a competitive tennis player.

Alex continues to develop his skills in legal practice under Yulia’s guidance, he plans to sit the Solicitor’s Qualifying Exams (SQE) in 2024.


Mehves Selamoglu


Mehves joined Barnes Law in August 2023, right after graduating from Queen Mary, University of London (LLB Senior Status). As part of her qualification journey, Mehves is currently pursuing her Legal Practice Course (‘LPC’) at the University of Law. She also holds a degree in European Union Law from Maastricht University, Netherlands.

Mehves works closely with Yulia on a variety of contentions matters and also writes Barnes Law’s legal blogs, manages social media accounts and is responsible for marketing.

Outside of work and studies, she enjoys running, tennis and yoga.

Mehves is looking forward to developing her legal skills at Barnes Law.


Julia Podgornova

Investor Relationship Manager

Julia guides clients in making important business decisions based on comprehensive risk assessment and strategy. She supports investors in devising strategies designed to maximise each business’s potential from pre-seed to IPO.

Julia’s particular area of expertise are IT start-ups at different stages. Julia supports business through their fund-raising journey. As an Investor Relations Manager, Julia communicates with investors to facilitate a smooth round and legal part of each transaction.

In her free time Julia enjoys sailing, ballroom dancing, art exhibitions and travel.